# Chef apt repo only has 0.9.8 for 10.04?

**URL:** <https://discourse.chef.io/t/chef-apt-repo-only-has-0-9-8-for-10-04/1688>\
**Category:** Chef Infra (archive)\
**Created:** [January 14, 2011, 7:34pm UTC](https://discourse.chef.io/t/chef-apt-repo-only-has-0-9-8-for-10-04/1688 "2011-01-14T19:34:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mark\_J\_Reed](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.chef.io/mark_j_reed/32/776_2.png) [@Mark\_J\_Reed](https://discourse.chef.io/u/Mark_J_Reed)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2011, 7:34pm UTC](https://discourse.chef.io/t/chef-apt-repo-only-has-0-9-8-for-10-04/1688/1 "2011-01-14T19:34:51Z")

</div>

I could have sworn it used to have 0.9.12. Was I hallucinating?

[http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages](http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages)

–  
Mark J. Reed [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mark\_J\_Reed](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.chef.io/mark_j_reed/32/776_2.png) [@Mark\_J\_Reed](https://discourse.chef.io/u/Mark_J_Reed)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2011, 7:42pm UTC](https://discourse.chef.io/t/chef-apt-repo-only-has-0-9-8-for-10-04/1688/2 "2011-01-14T19:42:18Z")

</div>

OK, I wasn't hallucinating, but I got it from sid, not lucid. NM.

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Mark J. Reed [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com) wrote:

> I could have sworn it used to have 0.9.12. Was I hallucinating?
> 
> [http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages](http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages)
> 
> --  
> Mark J. Reed [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com)

--  
Mark J. Reed [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stephen\_Nelson\_Smith](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eada6e/32.png) [@Stephen\_Nelson\_Smith](https://discourse.chef.io/u/Stephen_Nelson_Smith)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2011, 7:45pm UTC](https://discourse.chef.io/t/chef-apt-repo-only-has-0-9-8-for-10-04/1688/3 "2011-01-14T19:45:28Z")

</div>

0.9.12 hasn't been pushed as it is considered insufficiently tested  
with the open source server. Grab the newest version from the sid  
repo if you require features or fixes \> 0.9.8.

For bootstrapping you can edit the sources.list in the stock ubuntu-  
apt erb template and drop it in .chef/bootstrap and knife will pick it  
up.

We should probably push 0.9.12 - it's been a good few months now.  
Anyone able to report successes or failures with the open source server?

S.

On 14 Jan 2011, at 19:34, "Mark J. Reed" [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com) wrote:

> I could have sworn it used to have 0.9.12. Was I hallucinating?
> 
> [http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages](http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages)
> 
> --  
> Mark J. Reed [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joshua\_Timberman](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discourse.chef.io/joshua_timberman/32/424_2.png) [@Joshua\_Timberman](https://discourse.chef.io/u/Joshua_Timberman)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2011, 11:53pm UTC](https://discourse.chef.io/t/chef-apt-repo-only-has-0-9-8-for-10-04/1688/4 "2011-01-14T23:53:23Z")

</div>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----  
Hash: SHA1

I actually just fixed this about an hour ago - 0.9.12 is in all debian and ubuntu components on our apt server. The exception is still maverick, per [http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-1976](http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-1976). We'll get that updated sometime next week.

On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:

> 0.9.12 hasn't been pushed as it is considered insufficiently tested with the open source server. Grab the newest version from the sid repo if you require features or fixes \> 0.9.8.
> 
> For bootstrapping you can edit the sources.list in the stock ubuntu-apt erb template and drop it in .chef/bootstrap and knife will pick it up.
> 
> We should probably push 0.9.12 - it's been a good few months now. Anyone able to report successes or failures with the open source server?
> 
> S.
> 
> On 14 Jan 2011, at 19:34, "Mark J. Reed" [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com) wrote:
> 
> > I could have sworn it used to have 0.9.12. Was I hallucinating?
> > 
> > [http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages](http://apt.opscode.com/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd64/Packages)
> > 
> > --  
> > Mark J. Reed [markjreed@gmail.com](mailto:markjreed@gmail.com)

* * *

Opscode, Inc  
Joshua Timberman, Technical Evangelist  
IRC, Skype, Twitter, Github: jtimberman

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----  
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0w4fMACgkQO97WSdVpzT236wCeNau5pqaoA56VAI7mveJlIcS6  
sUMAn2I3KdHic8m/PZhoLDgSwCGqiJlg  
=Oicv  
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----