I just wrote that today, but it did work before I bumped the clients to
11.6.0 from 11.4.4. And I’m not seeing any changes in the cookbook that
seem to apply to this.
–
~~ StormeRider ~~
“Every world needs its heroes […] They inspire us to be better than we
are. And they protect from the darkness that’s just around the corner.”
I just wrote that today, but it did work before I bumped the clients to
11.6.0 from 11.4.4. And I'm not seeing any changes in the cookbook that
seem to apply to this.
One of our developers found this issue today and has submitted a fix for
the sudo cookbook here:
https://github.com/opscode-cookbooks/sudo/pull/29
The sudo lwrp manipulates the template in a bit of a non-standard way:
I just wrote that today, but it did work before I bumped the clients to
11.6.0 from 11.4.4. And I’m not seeing any changes in the cookbook that
seem to apply to this.
One of our developers found this issue today and has submitted a fix for
the sudo cookbook here:
https://github.com/opscode-cookbooks/sudo/pull/29
The sudo lwrp manipulates the template in a bit of a non-standard way:
On 7/25/13 5:25 PM, Morgan Blackthorne wrote:
I just tried bumping my nodes to 11.6.0 and got this error from a recipe
using the sudo LWRP. Any thoughts?
I just wrote that today, but it did work before I bumped the clients to
11.6.0 from 11.4.4. And I’m not seeing any changes in the cookbook that
seem to apply to this.
One of our developers found this issue today and has submitted a fix for
the sudo cookbook here:
On 7/25/13 5:25 PM, Morgan Blackthorne wrote:
I just tried bumping my nodes to 11.6.0 and got this error from a recipe
using the sudo LWRP. Any thoughts?
I just wrote that today, but it did work before I bumped the clients to
11.6.0 from 11.4.4. And I’m not seeing any changes in the cookbook that
seem to apply to this.
One of our developers found this issue today and has submitted a fix for
the sudo cookbook here:
I pushed an alternative branch that removes the node attribute use in those templates entirely. Also, doesn't appear that the template for the recipe needs @node.
Joshua
On Thursday, July 25, 2013 at 19:42, Steven Danna wrote:
On 7/25/13 6:56 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
Steven,
Do all uses of node['fqdn'] need to be converted to @node['fqdn'] in erbs going forward?
No. The only cookbooks that would need to change are those that directly
use Erubis::Eruby like the sudo cookbook does:
On 7/25/13 5:25 PM, Morgan Blackthorne wrote:
I just tried bumping my nodes to 11.6.0 and got this error from a recipe
using the sudo LWRP. Any thoughts?
I just wrote that today, but it did work before I bumped the clients to
11.6.0 from 11.4.4. And I'm not seeing any changes in the cookbook that
seem to apply to this.
One of our developers found this issue today and has submitted a fix for
the sudo cookbook here:
Version 2.1.4 was released earlier today to resolve this. COOK-3399.
Cheers,
Joshua
On Thursday, July 25, 2013 at 20:10, Joshua Timberman wrote:
I pushed an alternative branch that removes the node attribute use in those templates entirely. Also, doesn’t appear that the template for the recipe needs @node.
On 7/25/13 5:25 PM, Morgan Blackthorne wrote:
I just tried bumping my nodes to 11.6.0 and got this error from a recipe
using the sudo LWRP. Any thoughts?
I just wrote that today, but it did work before I bumped the clients to
11.6.0 from 11.4.4. And I’m not seeing any changes in the cookbook that
seem to apply to this.
One of our developers found this issue today and has submitted a fix for
the sudo cookbook here: