Does anyone have relatively clean CentOS 5 and 6 AMIs or vagrant boxes? I
would prefer to use known good images to build Chef and dependencies rather
than random AMIs which may or may not contain vulnerabilities. RedHat images
are not an option because my amazon credits don’t cover them.
Thanks!
James
Yo,
On 24 July 2011 12:04, James js@aegisco.com wrote:
Does anyone have relatively clean CentOS 5 and 6 AMIs or vagrant boxes? I
would prefer to use known good images to build Chef and dependencies rather
than random AMIs which may or may not contain vulnerabilities. RedHat images
are not an option because my amazon credits don't cover them.
There are veewee definitions for centos6.0, probably that other junk
too. CentOS-6.0 templates by simonsd · Pull Request #78 · jedi4ever/veewee · GitHub
Check out the chef-box project from @dysinger; you might be able to
make use of it.
https://github.com/dysinger/chef-box
–AJ
Hmm -- that veewee definition looks to be puppet-only.
I can't argue that too much, though, as the one I use is Chef-only (using
RBEL for packages): CentOS-6.0 (i386) + RBEL Chef veewee definition · GitHub
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:07 PM, AJ Christensen aj@junglist.gen.nz wrote:
Yo,
On 24 July 2011 12:04, James js@aegisco.com wrote:
Does anyone have relatively clean CentOS 5 and 6 AMIs or vagrant boxes? I
would prefer to use known good images to build Chef and dependencies
rather
than random AMIs which may or may not contain vulnerabilities. RedHat
images
are not an option because my amazon credits don't cover them.There are veewee definitions for centos6.0, probably that other junk
too. CentOS-6.0 templates by simonsd · Pull Request #78 · jedi4ever/veewee · GitHubCheck out the chef-box project from @dysinger; you might be able to
make use of it.https://github.com/dysinger/chef-box
–AJ
Just wanted to say, that veewee templates should include both chef and
puppet as a default.
The centos definitions should be usable for both now.
you guys have fun with it
On 24/07/11 21:33, Charles Duffy wrote:
Hmm -- that veewee definition looks to be puppet-only.
I can't argue that too much, though, as the one I use is Chef-only
(using RBEL for packages): CentOS-6.0 (i386) + RBEL Chef veewee definition · GitHubOn Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:07 PM, AJ Christensen <aj@junglist.gen.nz
mailto:aj@junglist.gen.nz> wrote:Yo, On 24 July 2011 12:04, James <js@aegisco.com <mailto:js@aegisco.com>> wrote: > Does anyone have relatively clean CentOS 5 and 6 AMIs or vagrant boxes? I > would prefer to use known good images to build Chef and dependencies rather > than random AMIs which may or may not contain vulnerabilities. RedHat images > are not an option because my amazon credits don't cover them. There are veewee definitions for centos6.0, probably that other junk too. https://github.com/jedi4ever/veewee/pull/78 Check out the chef-box project from @dysinger; you might be able to make use of it. https://github.com/dysinger/chef-box –AJ