Providing signing key from an alternative source

I’m using the chef REST API client (in code), and I would like to provide
the signing key from somewhere other than the filesystem.

Looking at Chef::REST::AuthCredentials, I’m thinking of replacing the
load_signing_key by redefining the method.

Anyone else play with this? Any caveats?

On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, andi abes wrote:

I'm using the chef REST API client (in code), and I would like to provide the signing key from somewhere other than the filesystem.

Looking at Chef::REST::AuthCredentials, I'm thinking of replacing the load_signing_key by redefining the method.

Anyone else play with this? Any caveats?
Looks like you just need to pass :raw_key => true to Chef::REST.new

--
Daniel DeLeo

what version are you looking at? I'm on 10.8

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel DeLeo dan@kallistec.com wrote:

On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, andi abes wrote:

I'm using the chef REST API client (in code), and I would like to provide
the signing key from somewhere other than the filesystem.

Looking at Chef::REST::AuthCredentials, I'm thinking of replacing the
load_signing_key by redefining the method.

Anyone else play with this? Any caveats?

Looks like you just need to pass :raw_key => true to Chef::REST.new

--
Daniel DeLeo

On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 10:41 AM, andi abes wrote:

what version are you looking at? I'm on 10.8

Ticket is:

http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-3438

Which I think is only merged to master. If you're using Chef as a library in another application it should be fine to start from there (and super easy to do if you're using bundler).

--
Daniel DeLeo

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel DeLeo <dan@kallistec.com (mailto:dan@kallistec.com)> wrote:

On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, andi abes wrote:

I'm using the chef REST API client (in code), and I would like to provide the signing key from somewhere other than the filesystem.

Looking at Chef::REST::AuthCredentials, I'm thinking of replacing the load_signing_key by redefining the method.

Anyone else play with this? Any caveats?
Looks like you just need to pass :raw_key => true to Chef::REST.new

--
Daniel DeLeo

I ended up creating a little monkeypatch for the rest client. This was
complicated a bit by having different Chef objects instantiate their own
REST client in subtly different ways...
In case it helps other folks still on 10.x, (and in case folk spot issues I
didn't...)

The idea is that once you "replace_authenticator", all future REST
instances will use the alternative client/key.

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Daniel DeLeo dan@kallistec.com wrote:

On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 10:41 AM, andi abes wrote:

what version are you looking at? I'm on 10.8

Ticket is:

http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-3438

Which I think is only merged to master. If you're using Chef as a library
in another application it should be fine to start from there (and super
easy to do if you're using bundler).

--
Daniel DeLeo

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Daniel DeLeo dan@kallistec.com wrote:

On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, andi abes wrote:

I'm using the chef REST API client (in code), and I would like to provide
the signing key from somewhere other than the filesystem.

Looking at Chef::REST::AuthCredentials, I'm thinking of replacing the
load_signing_key by redefining the method.

Anyone else play with this? Any caveats?

Looks like you just need to pass :raw_key => true to Chef::REST.new

--
Daniel DeLeo

On Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 7:13 AM, andi abes wrote:

I ended up creating a little monkeypatch for the rest client. This was complicated a bit by having different Chef objects instantiate their own REST client in subtly different ways...
In case it helps other folks still on 10.x, (and in case folk spot issues I didn't...)

replace-auth · GitHub

The idea is that once you "replace_authenticator", all future REST instances will use the alternative client/key.

I see.

I recently ran into this use case myself. The correct code to use the "raw_key" option is like this:

Chef::REST.new(Chef::Config[:chef_server_url], entity_name, nil, :raw_key => client.private_key)

But as you alluded to, most of the model objects in Chef don't give you control over the rest client. I think it would be reasonable to add support for that if you're interested.

--
Daniel DeLeo