Exactly how you do it depends on your specific architecture, so I can’t really be of too much help. What I was actually thinking of was to invoke knife to add attributes to the node.
When you say “locally” do you mean, local to the node, or local to the chef workstation?
Kevin Keane
The NetTech
Our values: Privacy, Liberty, Justice
See https://www.4nettech.com/corp/the-nettech-values.html
-----Original message-----
From: Doug Garstang doug@slice.com
Sent: Tuesday 8th September 2015 15:26
To: chef@lists.opscode.com
Subject: [chef] Re: RE: Re: Re: Populating attributes from the system.
Kevin,
The run list is populated by a script that runs locally and reads a config file. It sounds like your suggesting I convert this config file to json and pass it to the chef-client with -j? Those attributes are immediately available, right?
Doug.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Kevin Keane Subscription <subscription@kkeane.com mailto:subscription@kkeane.com > wrote:
I agree that such an application-specific thing is not the best use of Ohai.
How do you populate the node’s run list? For the scenario you describe, it seems to me that whatever tool you use to do that should also look for this specific file and either change the run list, or set node attributes based on the settings in this file.
I have a “main” cookbook that handles these types of things. When I bring up a new node, initially only the main cookbook is in the runlist, and it then populates the run list, as well as figures out various attribute settings.
Kevin Keane
The NetTech
http://www.4nettech.com http://www.4nettech.com
Our values: Privacy, Liberty, Justice
See https://www.4nettech.com/corp/the-nettech-values.html
-----Original message-----
From: Douglas Garstang <doug.garstang@gmail.com mailto:doug.garstang@gmail.com >
Sent: Tuesday 8th September 2015 13:09
To: chef@lists.opscode.com mailto:chef@lists.opscode.com
Subject: [chef] Re: Re: Populating attributes from the system.
Adam,
I guess it feels wrong because I’m writing application specific things into something that’s supposed to read to get system info. Our CloudFormation template is writing a file to the local filesystem that my chef cookbook needs to be able to read in order to know what branch, release etc of code to deploy. The custom ohai documentation is pretty slim as well, and it usually takes me a lot longer to get something working with ohai that it would a library.
Using the community ohai cookbook and also seeing this:
==> default: /opt/chef/embedded/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/ohai-7.0.4/lib/ohai/plugins/linux/network.rb:49: warning: already initialized constant IPROUTE_INT_REGEX
Ohai just feels less well documented and maintained.
Doug.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Adam Leff <adam@leff.co mailto:adam@leff.co > wrote:
Doug-
If the data you’re trying to extract is part of your system and not curated during a Chef run, I think Ohai is a perfect solution for this. The first recipe in your nodes’ run_lists could also deploy that Ohai plugin and reload it right away (if it needed to be deployed during that run) such that the rest of your chef-client run would have immediate access to the new plugin’s data.
Could you elaborate as to why you do not feel the Ohai plugin approach is the right fit?
~Adam
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:29 PM Doug Garstang <doug@slice.com mailto:doug@slice.com > wrote:
This problem keeps popping up, and it never feels quite right.
I need to extract some data from the system and populate node attributes from that, so that my cookbook will function.
If I use a library to get the system info, then I have move the setting of the attributes out of attributes/ files into a recipe, and make sure that recipe runs first. Any attributes that are derived from these attributes also have to be put into the same recipe. I then have some attributes being defined in attributes files and some recipes which doesn’t feel right.
Writing an ohai plugin that pulls the system info means that the attributes are immediately available as ohai data when chef runs. This also feels like the wrong approach though.
What is the right way to do this?
Doug.
–
Regards,
Douglas Garstang
http://www.linkedin.com/in/garstang http://www.linkedin.com/in/garstang
Email: doug.garstang@gmail.com mailto:doug.garstang@gmail.com
Cell: +1-805-340-5627
It means any schmuck can start a CloudFormation
It means any schmuck can start a CloudFormation stack and not have to know anything about the internals of how the instance is configured.
